waterspyder: (Default)
waterspyder ([personal profile] waterspyder) wrote2005-02-23 06:41 pm

Telemarketers

Apparently I feel the need to lie and seek amusement from telemarketers. From the time I tell them I'm not interested twice, I consider them fair game.

Me: "I'm sorry, I am not interested, I really don't have any interest in this product regardless of the savings"
Her: "Well perhaps your husband might be interested in such wonderful magazines"
Me: "My partner is a woman"
Her: "Oh. *pause* Well you have a good night then"

She knew she was screwed at that point. Too bad I was lying in this particular instance.

On a more moral ground, it is heterosexist to presume that I am married to a man. Maybe she'll learn to use more gender neutral terminology. Probably not.

[identity profile] feli-valkyria.livejournal.com 2005-02-23 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
*rotflmao* ... Good one :P ... yes it is sexist to assume that we're all heterosexual.

Besides, most of us are bi :P lol...

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-23 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll apologize to my male partner later. He'll understand.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
It's silly to presume that you're married honestly :)

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, and another good answer would have been "Which one?"

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
LOL
I guess we just have a skewed point of reference that the majority of our friends and acquaintances are bipoly
To me, heterosexual and monogamous is the minority

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, the majority of strangers that I meet assume I'm married.
Then I cut off my hair, and now they assume I have children too.
I still have no insight into this.

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Except for something Marty said one time. Sort of made sense in that particular context, but not widely applicable.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's the blue hair.

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
I still don't know how blue hair correlates to being married

[identity profile] kali-kali.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
Pah, if she were doing her job properly she'd jump to offer it to your female partner too ;)

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
She was too plastic, I knew it would mess her up. She was breathing where her cue card told her to breathe.

[identity profile] kali-kali.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Probably new then. We experienced telephone-call-and-annoy-you-people know that any person in the house is a potential survey respondent/sale/whatever, and don't bat an eye over anything like that. I think I surveyed some guy who was in the middle of masturbating once. But I got the survey done, so I didn't really care what was going on on the other end of the line.

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
You're hardcore!!

I spot the ones I can fuck with. Turnover is so high in call centres that a lot of them are new. It's really bad when you ask a rep a question and you get dead silence on the phone, but I worked client service for so long I know what buttons to push. It's not fair really, but then again they shouldn't try to sell me the same thing by phone every year.

I do take the time to do surveys though. Those don't cost me money and lock me into a 36 month contract.

[identity profile] kali-kali.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Some surveys will even pay you - pay close attention! Some will ask at the end if you'd be interested in being considered for research panels or whatever, and if you go to those, they could pay you like 50 bucks for talking about stuff for two hours. Other surveys also offer you free stuff.

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
I was on a panel for determining wording for government census reports with regard to the glbt community
that was fun
the researchers got a little uneasy when the group brought up trans issues, since they had no representation there that night
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
I got the impression the governemnt were actually full on neglectful of trans issues. We recommended alternative boxes to tick for sex, and they looked at us funny.
At least the community looks to be more on board with trans rights, even if the world at large isn't

[identity profile] mellian.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
that is true.

-mellian

[identity profile] mellian.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
i would think the government has my number by now for such things... :p


-mellian

[identity profile] evilbitchqueen.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
This reminds me of a certain paper due to a prof who asked why you had to go with me to court.

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 08:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, the questioning stops immediately when they think you might have a same sex partner.

[identity profile] evilbitchqueen.livejournal.com 2005-02-24 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I know, I just thinks it funny that he never called to verify it or anything

[identity profile] waterspyder.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Without knowing me, would you want to puch my buttons?

[identity profile] evilbitchqueen.livejournal.com 2005-02-25 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
depends, which buttons do I get to push? *EG*