The paired-semispherical element is the first major point of comparaison. The reason why i called them somewhat-secondary sex characteristics were the fact that while both are linked to reproduction, neither one is directly involved in the physical element of intercourse. They share somewhat that element of functionality aswell as overall form on the most general sense.
I am fully cogniscent of the biological terminology. I used the word "somewhat" as a qualifyer, stating that neither piece of anatomy is physically involved in the process of intercourse yet both are vital to mamillian reproduction. It's a laymann's viewpoint that i am speaking of and not one of the precise terms.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
no no no.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_sexual_characteristic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sexual_characteristic
From:
no subject
Either way, it's not of much import.
From:
no subject
2. if you're going to make the claim that you're not being 'technical' then you shouldn't use 'technical' terms such as "secondary sex characteristic"
3. if what you have to say isn't important, why are you saying it?