the author stated that polygamy was a mark of an unappreciative individual and the professor was adding his $0.02 with his food analogy and then a little extra that the author had nothing to say on the subject.
I think that when a professor adds his personal opinion as matter of lecture, he is leaving himself open to be argued with.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-06-14 03:04 pm (UTC)I think that when a professor adds his personal opinion as matter of lecture, he is leaving himself open to be argued with.